WorldTax Compareโ† All Comparisons

China vs Poland
Tax Rate Comparison

Enter your income below for a personal tax estimate, then scroll down for full rate breakdowns.

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China
vs
๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland
Tax Year:

๐Ÿ’ฐ Personal Income Tax Calculator

Enter your income to see your estimated annual tax liability in each country โ€” side by side.

Enter your annual income above to see your personal tax comparison โ†’
Individual Income Tax (Top Marginal Rate)
Top Income Tax Rate
3โ€“45%
Continued deduction reforms; threshold adjustments likely
No change
12โ€“32%
Potential third (40%) bracket for very high earners
No change
VAT / GST / Sales Tax
VAT / GST / Sales Tax
6โ€“13%
13%/9%/6% structure maintained
No change
5โ€“23%
Food VAT returning to 5% after 0% temporary measure
No change
Corporate Tax Rate
Corporate Tax Rate
25%
Pillar Two implementation progressing
No change
9โ€“19%
CIT stable; EU harmonization ongoing
No change
Capital Gains Tax
Capital Gains Tax
20%
National property tax reform bill still pending
No change
19%
Potential revision to capital income taxation
No change
Social Security & Payroll
Social Security / Payroll
~36%
Gradual unification of social insurance base ongoing
No change
~34.6%
Pension system pressures; contributions stable
No change
State, Regional & Local Taxes

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China โ€” Provincial, Municipal & Surcharge Taxes

China's 34 provincial-level regions vary in social insurance rates (employer contributions: ~16โ€“23% depending on province). Cities impose Urban Maintenance & Construction Tax (1โ€“7% of VAT paid). Education surcharges add 3โ€“5%. Local governments levy land use taxes by city tier. Free Trade Zones often have preferential 15% corporate rates.

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland โ€” Local & Municipal Taxes

Poland's 16 voivodeships do not levy their own income taxes. Municipalities collect property tax (podatek od nieruchomoล›ci) within national limits. The Polish Deal (Polski ลad) reforms of 2022 significantly changed income tax. A health insurance contribution (9% of income) is no longer deductible, effectively raising the burden. The JDG (sole proprietor) regime offers flat 19% or lump-sum options.

โš ๏ธ Disclaimer: Rates shown are standard top/headline rates for informational purposes. Actual tax liability depends on income level, residency, deductions, and tax treaties. 2025โ€“2026 data reflects announced or enacted rates and may be subject to change. Not financial or legal advice.

China vs Poland: Key Tax Differences (2026)

๐Ÿ’ฐ Income Tax: ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China has a higher top income tax rate (3โ€“45% vs 12โ€“32%). ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland is more favourable for high earners.

๐Ÿ›’ VAT/Sales Tax: Poland has a higher consumption tax (6โ€“13% vs 5โ€“23%).

๐Ÿข Corporate Tax: ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland offers a lower corporate rate (19% vs 25%), which can influence business location decisions.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Capital Gains: ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland taxes investment gains at a lower rate (19% vs 20%), benefiting investors.

Related Comparisons

๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia vs ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ChinaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria vs ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ PolandTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada vs ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ChinaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช GermanyTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong KongTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ IndiaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต JapanTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฟ New ZealandTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ RussiaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ SingaporeTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South KoreaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China vs ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ TaiwanTax comparison